Web Fonts
January 9, 20256 min read

WOFF vs WOFF2: Web Font Performance Comparison 2025

Comprehensive analysis of WOFF and WOFF2 web font formats to help you choose the best option for modern web performance and browser compatibility.

Performance Winner: WOFF2

30%
Better Compression
161ms
Median Load Time
95%
Browser Support

Quick Comparison Table

FeatureWOFFWOFF2
CompressionGood (Gzip)Excellent (Brotli)
File SizeBaseline30% Smaller
Load Speed171ms161ms
Browser SupportIE9+ (Universal)Modern Browsers
Best Use CaseLegacy FallbackModern Web

Understanding WOFF Formats

What is WOFF?

WOFF (Web Open Font Format) was introduced in 2009 as the first web-optimized font format. It compresses TTF/OTF fonts using gzip compression, reducing file sizes by approximately 40% compared to raw font files.

Key WOFF characteristics:

  • Gzip compression algorithm
  • Maintains font quality
  • Universal browser support
  • Metadata embedding support
  • Cross-origin security features

What is WOFF2?

WOFF2 is the next-generation web font format, introduced in 2014. It uses Google's Brotli compression algorithm and advanced preprocessing techniques to achieve superior compression rates.

Key WOFF2 improvements:

  • Brotli compression (30% better than gzip)
  • Advanced preprocessing
  • Better performance metrics
  • Optimized for modern web standards
  • Maintained backward compatibility concepts

Performance Analysis

Compression Comparison

WOFF Compression

Algorithm: Gzip/Deflate

Reliable compression with ~40% size reduction from original TTF/OTF files

Example File Sizes

  • • TTF: 200KB → WOFF: 120KB
  • • OTF: 180KB → WOFF: 108KB
WOFF2 Compression

Algorithm: Brotli

Advanced compression achieving ~60% size reduction from original files

Example File Sizes

  • • TTF: 200KB → WOFF2: 80KB
  • • OTF: 180KB → WOFF2: 72KB

Real-World Performance Data

Based on 2025 web performance measurements:

Loading Speed Comparison:

  • WOFF: 171ms median loading time
  • WOFF2: 161ms median loading time
  • Improvement: ~6% faster loading with WOFF2

Network Impact:

  • Data Transfer: WOFF2 saves 30% bandwidth
  • Mobile Performance: Significantly better on slow connections
  • Core Web Vitals: WOFF2 improves Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)

Browser Support Analysis

WOFF Browser Support (Universal)

Supported Browsers

Desktop
  • • Internet Explorer 9+
  • • Chrome 6+ (2010)
  • • Firefox 3.6+ (2010)
  • • Safari 5.1+ (2011)
  • • Edge (all versions)
Mobile
  • • iOS Safari 5+ (2011)
  • • Android Browser 4.4+
  • • Chrome Mobile (all)
  • • Samsung Internet (all)

WOFF2 Browser Support (Modern)

Supported Browsers

Desktop
  • • Chrome 36+ (2014)
  • • Firefox 39+ (2015)
  • • Safari 12+ (2018)
  • • Edge 14+ (2016)
  • • ❌ Internet Explorer (no support)
Mobile
  • • iOS Safari 12+ (2018)
  • • Android Chrome 36+
  • • Samsung Internet 3.4+
  • • UC Browser (recent versions)

Implementation Strategy

Best Practice: Progressive Enhancement

The recommended approach in 2025 is to use both formats with WOFF2 as primary and WOFF as fallback:
@font-face {
  font-family: 'YourFont';
  src: url('font.woff2') format('woff2'),
       url('font.woff') format('woff');
  font-display: swap;
}

Font Loading Strategy

Optimized Font Loading

1. Preload Critical Fonts
<link rel="preload" href="font.woff2" as="font" type="font/woff2" crossorigin>
2. Use font-display: swap

Prevents invisible text during font load

3. Subset Fonts

Include only needed characters to reduce file size

When to Choose Each Format

Choose WOFF2 When:

  • Modern web projects (95%+ browser support acceptable)
  • Performance is critical (mobile-first, Core Web Vitals)
  • Bandwidth matters (international audiences, slow connections)
  • SEO optimization (faster loading improves rankings)
  • Progressive web apps (modern browser targets)

Choose WOFF When:

  • Legacy browser support required (IE9-11)
  • Enterprise environments with old browsers
  • Email templates (limited CSS support)
  • Fallback format in progressive enhancement
  • Maximum compatibility is priority over performance

Technical Differences

Compression Algorithms

WOFF (Gzip/Deflate):

  • Mature, well-tested compression
  • Moderate compression ratios
  • Fast decompression
  • Universal browser support

WOFF2 (Brotli):

  • Advanced compression algorithm
  • Superior compression ratios
  • Optimized for text content
  • Preprocessing optimizations

File Structure Improvements

WOFF2 includes several technical enhancements:

WOFF2 Optimizations

  • • Glyph outline preprocessing
  • • Optimized table ordering
  • • Enhanced metadata handling
  • • Better compression of font tables

Performance Benefits

  • • 30% smaller file sizes
  • • Faster decompression
  • • Reduced memory usage
  • • Better caching efficiency

Migration Guide: WOFF to WOFF2

Step 1: Convert Your Fonts

Use our free conversion tools to create WOFF2 versions:

Step 2: Update CSS

Replace single-format declarations with progressive enhancement:
/* Old: WOFF only */
@font-face {
  font-family: 'MyFont';
  src: url('font.woff') format('woff');
}

/* New: Progressive enhancement */
@font-face {
  font-family: 'MyFont';
  src: url('font.woff2') format('woff2'),
       url('font.woff') format('woff');
  font-display: swap;
}

Step 3: Test and Measure

  • Verify font loading in all target browsers
  • Measure performance improvements with tools like PageSpeed Insights
  • Monitor Core Web Vitals metrics
  • Test on slow network connections

Future Outlook

WOFF2 Adoption Trends

Current Status (2025):

  • WOFF2 support reaches 95%+ of web users
  • Major CDNs default to WOFF2
  • Google Fonts serves WOFF2 as primary format
  • Performance-focused sites prioritize WOFF2

Recommendations:

  • WOFF2 should be your primary web font format
  • Keep WOFF for legacy support (optional for most projects)
  • Variable fonts increasingly use WOFF2
  • Consider abandoning WOFF-only for new projects

Conclusion

WOFF2 is the clear winner for modern web development in 2025:

  • 30% better compression than WOFF
  • Faster loading times and better performance
  • 95% browser support covers virtually all users
  • SEO benefits from improved Core Web Vitals
  • Future-proof technology with ongoing support

Recommended Strategy:

  1. Use WOFF2 as your primary web font format
  2. Include WOFF fallback only if legacy support is required
  3. Implement proper font loading with `font-display: swap`
  4. Preload critical fonts for optimal performance

The performance gains from WOFF2 are significant enough that most websites should prioritize it, with WOFF serving as an optional fallback for the small percentage of users on very old browsers.

---